BUSINESS Judge rules Qualcomm violated antitrust law in chip market


Judge rules Qualcomm violated antitrust law in chip market


04:32, May 23, 2019


A sign advertises 5G at the Qualcomm booth at CES International in Las Vegas Jan. 9, 2019. (Photo: AP)

A federal judge has ruled that Qualcomm unlawfully squeezed out rivals in the cellphone chip market and charged excessive royalties to cellphone manufacturers such as Apple.

The decision issued Tuesday vindicates the US Federal Trade Commission two years after it filed its antitrust lawsuit. It’s a potentially costly setback for Qualcomm that undercuts a key piece of its business.

US District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, ruled that Qualcomm must renegotiate licensing deals with customers. The San Diego company must license its patents to rival chip makers at fair prices and can’t sign exclusive supply agreements with smartphone makers like Apple that block competitors from access to that market. Qualcomm must submit to monitoring for the next seven years to make sure it follows the order.

The outcome seems likely to reduce the licensing fees paid on the sales of smartphones, but it’s unclear if the device makers will pass on any of their savings and lower their prices. The royalties represent a relatively small portion of smartphone prices that now top $1,000 for some premium models.

Qualcomm Inc. said Wednesday that it will appeal.

“We strongly disagree with the judge’s conclusions, her interpretation of the facts and her application of the law,” Qualcomm general counsel Don Rosenberg said in a statement.

Qualcomm justified its “no license, no chips” system as a way to be repaid for the $40 billion it has spent through several decades working on wireless technology essential to smartphones.

Last month Apple and Qualcomm settled a bitter financial dispute centered on some of the technology that enables iPhones to connect to the internet. The deal requires Apple to pay Qualcomm an undisclosed amount. It also includes a six-year licensing agreement that likely involves recurring payments to the mobile chip maker.

Apple had already lost an earlier battle with Qualcomm in March when a federal court jury in San Diego decided the iPhone maker owed Qualcomm $31 million for infringing on three of its patents.

Qualcomm shares dropped nearly 11%, to $69.38, in morning trading.

Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy to comply with the latest laws and regulations. The updated policy explains the mechanism of how we collect and treat your personal data. You can learn more about the rights you have by reading our terms of service. Please read them carefully. By clicking AGREE, you indicate that you have read and agreed to our privacy policies

Agree and continue