WORLD EU steps closer to abolishing daylight savings after public consultation

WORLD

EU steps closer to abolishing daylight savings after public consultation

Xinhua

02:13, September 01, 2018

Capture.JPG

EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker (File photo: Xinhua)

BERLIN, Aug. 31 (Xinhua) -- The European Union (EU) will abolish daylight savings time in response to a recently-concluded public consultation across 28 members of bloc, EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker told the German public broadcaster ZDF on Friday.

Speaking on ZDF, Juncker announced that the European Commission would heed the demands of more than 80 percent of European respondents to scrap the practice. "We will do this today," he said. The traditional bi-annual shift in clocks in autumn and winter could then come to an abrupt end, subject to approval by the European Parliament (EU) and national heads of state represented in the European Council.

"The people want it, so we will do it," Juncker said. The Commission president argued that it would be pointless to question citizens on a subject, only to ignore the resulting outcome. While the support of the parliament is widely considered to be a given, most national governments have yet to take an open position on the issue.

Earlier, the Commission had repeatedly emphasized that its survey of 4.6 million people, less than one percent of the bloc's current total population of 512.6 million citizens, is neither representative or binding. According to reports, nearly three million of the votes counted in the poll were cast by Germans.

Daylight savings time was first proposed in the late 19th century as a means to enhance productivity and save energy. The German and Austro-Hungarian Empires were the first countries to commit to a nationwide implementation thereof on April 30, 1916.

As of 1996, all EU member states have advanced their clocks forward by an hour on the last Sunday in March, before reversing the move again on the last Sunday of October. Critics of daylight savings have argued that its energy saving benefits are negligible and outweighed by the disruption the practice causes to sleeping patterns.

Related Stories

Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy to comply with the latest laws and regulations. The updated policy explains the mechanism of how we collect and treat your personal data. You can learn more about the rights you have by reading our terms of service. Please read them carefully. By clicking AGREE, you indicate that you have read and agreed to our privacy policies

Agree and continue