WORLD US COVID-19 origins-tracing report 'offers no support' for lab leak theory: US columnist


US COVID-19 origins-tracing report 'offers no support' for lab leak theory: US columnist


19:00, November 02, 2021

A "Masks Required" sign at the entrance to the Ferry Building in San Francisco, California, U.S., July 19, 2021. /CFP

A full origins-tracing report released by U.S. intelligence agencies "effectively demolishes" the lab leak theory as the COVID-19 origin, U.S. columnist Michael Hiltzik, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, wrote in an article published in the Los Angeles Times on Monday.

Believers of the lab leak hypothesis had their hopes "dashed" as the assessment failed to validate their suspicions, said Hiltzik.

Following a brief summary in August, the full report was released on October 29, which "avoids offering a firm conclusion" on whether the novel coronavirus was originated from nature or leaked from a Chinese lab, but it provides details on how the assertions that support the lab leak theory are "wanting."

The columnist said the lab leak theory originated "with a clutch of anti-China ideologues in the State Department under Trump," who have changed the claims – from bioweapon to a lab leakage – to gain wider popularity.

The report dismissed the bioweapon allegations, saying they are "supported by scientifically invalid claims" and their proponents "do not have direct access to the Wuhan Institute of Virology" or are suspected of spreading disinformation.

It also noted that no genetic signatures in the virus that would indicate genetic engineering or any virus strains that could serve as a foundation for genetic engineering were found.

While it's plausible that a lab staffer was inadvertently infected, the report suggested that it's "less likely than an infection occurring through numerous hunters, farmers, merchants, and others who have frequent, natural contact with animals."

With reference to previous zoonotic outbreaks, the report said although no confirmed animal source for COVID-19 has been identified, that doesn't necessarily undermine the theory of a natural source. "The identification of animal sources has taken years, and in some cases, animal sources have not been identified," it added.

Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy to comply with the latest laws and regulations. The updated policy explains the mechanism of how we collect and treat your personal data. You can learn more about the rights you have by reading our terms of service. Please read them carefully. By clicking AGREE, you indicate that you have read and agreed to our privacy policies

Agree and continue